Ok… …a blanket ban on a set of protestors.

What’s the legal criteria to say somebody is a member of an organisation like this? Do they have to have a membership card to be banned from protests? It’s poorly defined and easily becomes anybody who turns up at a pro-palestinian protest. At that point you have banned protests on the subject.

Hold individuals accountable for their actions. Don’t police people’s views or their desire to express them.

Taking targeted action at those who perpetrated the sabotage would be my preference, rather than blanket bans on a protestors. This is the wrong way to solve the problem.

Classic US main character syndrome.

• America: We can unplug the world from the internet.
• Rest of the world: America unplugged itself from the internet.

He’s a member of the cabinet and so should know the government position. He can also state if UK forces acted in any part of the operation (e.g. refilling).

The decision may not be his but he should be enacting the effect of the decision. It’s absolutely reasonable to ask him.

Oh no, not the oil!

/s

They know they can’t compete at the new game, so want to play the old game.

Trouble is, the new game already started.

https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Manjaro:A_Different_Kind_of_Beast

Although Manjaro is Arch-based and Arch compatible, it is not Arch.

Manjaro package repository

Stable branch - There is no solid rule indicating when Stable branch is snapped from testing. It can be anything from one to four weeks…

Testing branch - Testing branch is snapped from unstable at irregular intervals - …

Unstable branch - Unstable branch is synced several times daily from Arch stable

Manjaro Unstable is Arch Stable

Apologies. I meant GW other wise the maths doesn’t work.

There’s multiple levels to it:

Sure, the chip makers make halo performance chips, but that’s because the phone makers are pushing them to make those chips for halo phones. The reason for that is that the public buy (or at least rent) halo phones.

Educating the public that there are reasons to buy more efficient phones should help shape the demand curve of the whole industry.

Designs which can be repaired can have specific parts taken out and recycled in isolation. If you can take the battery out easily you don’t have all the materials from the rest of phone contaminating your recycling pipeline.

I’m sure it would be very useful. Doesn’t mean I want ANYBODY having that kind of information.

…but the power draw is what sets the battery life for a particular size of battery. We don’t particularly want to set up a game that just incentivises putting bigger batteries in, so we have a metric for power draw.

It should not remain in the NHS in my opinion. It should be deleted after the analysis is done.

I would expect Steam to report Steam OS as Steam OS.

They managed to differentiate Manjaro to it’s own entry after all. It’s Arch based too.

Mrs Merton: What was it that first attracted you to millionaire Paul Daniels billionaire Jeff Bezos?

I’m quite impressed Arch comes out on top

EU leaders will now have to decide whether there is sufficient support to take action.

All EU governments are facing immigration crises which are fueling the rise of nationalistic factions. They could take an action here which would stop a population being forcibly displaced. Can they not draw a line between the two?

Yes, you have the support at home.

For those asking “Why bother? The energy usage is tiny”.

https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en#consumers-1

Mobile phones and tablets produced under these rules will save almost 14 terawatt hours in primary energy each year by 2030. This is one third of the primary energy consumption of these products today. The new rules will also help to optimise the use and recycling of critical raw materials.

In 2030, the savings on EU27 acquisition costs are € 20 billion, which combined with € 0.6 bn lower energy costs and € 0.8 bn additional repair costs, leads to € 19.8 billion (22%) expense savings (€ 98 per household).

So basically, by promoting energy efficient and repairable devices, the plan is to save €20bn annually in savings and not to generate 14TWh of electic power across the EU. That power saving is about the annual output of a single nuclear reactor. (1.6GW x 24h x 365.25d = 14TWh)

Blame the education system. They ingrained the concept of A being the best in all of us.

You don’t care about battery life?