They certainly didn’t conduct themselves in a polite or persuasive manner during their argument(s). As others have said in this thread: he has attacked everything but the topic and when they did they (purposefully) seemed very confused about the overall goal and desire of the campaign.

Is this a case of being wrong about your initial conclusions and doubling down? Or is this a bad actor spreading purposeful misinformation? Going by the video alone it’s hard to see an alternative.

Maybe give this one a watch and see what you think?

Respectfully, your response appeared to be one of apparent bewilderment and negativity at the very idea of the topic. If you just don’t care about it that’s one thing but if you think the overall goal (for lack of better words) is “dumb” or “pointless” I’d be really interested to know why you feel that way.

Thanks for getting back to me either way.

Did you watch the video? I thought they were very clear and articulate with their intended goal. Which part specifically seems silly or confused you?