

Yeah, but in his defense I don’t think there’s anything in the safety regulations about post mortem remains being identifiable. LOL.
Yeah, but in his defense I don’t think there’s anything in the safety regulations about post mortem remains being identifiable. LOL.
I believe in free speech. The first amendment is easily looked up.
I’m supposed to provide examples of horrible speech that has the right to exist? WTF?
The first amendment DOES have limitations. I think yelling “fire” in a crowded theater is often cited.
Also platforms can control that speech because they own the platform and can forbid it as part of their terms. And I wish they would.
If you can’t see that suppressing the speech of people who think opposite of you is exactly what they would do to you, then there’s not much I can say. I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.
None that come to mind. Relevance?
Why were you down voted for that? It’s ridiculous. It’s literally a paraphrasing of Thomas Paine saying, “I may not agree with what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.” FFS. That IS freedom of speech.
Is there nothing that he won’t fuck up?