If WebDav is your everyday bread, and you Linux your house, then you won’t find anything special. But for most users, it is great. The app works seamlessly for me, but surely, there are others that would work similarly. But the real strength is…
…in their well curated blog. I found step-by-step instructions on almost everything I wanted to do with Koofr. That helped a million.
There are a gazillion services like this one, every single one of them claims to have a Linux client.
Every client is an electron based app for debían, if you can’t use that, you’re left (if lucky) with a lousy WebDAV that’s slower than a 90’s AOL dial up connection.
the tray icon/app is indeed some kind of electron thing. it basically just configures a folder in you home that syncs 2 ways. webdav works fine. tested with kde’s dolphin and with rclone. sometimes using one of them is much slower than the other, I don’t understand webdav that well. the android app basically allows to navigate the whole thing and download only what you want or keep some things synced locally. there’s also the option to automatically send everything new like new photos to the cloud with it on the background. been working fine.
So, can anyone tell me the difference beetween them and Hetzner?
I would say Koofr is more meant for everyday customers who want online storage.
It is I, everyday costumer, and I am using an Smb share and rtp as my everyday method to connect to my cloud since it has way nicer integration with just about everything without having to use their app.
