• the_q@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Humans don’t want to suffer which is why they won’t change their habits. To be fair with the amount of money used to back misinformation campaigns and capitalistic slogans like “treat yourself” is it really surprising things go this way?

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Nah, we as a species have decided to stop wars and solve world hunger by using a clever trick the scientists don’t want us to know. Did you know that you can do all that and more by reducing the population to approximately zero. All you have to do is dive head first into the climate disaster and embrace the destruction. If the world is on fire, there will be no one left to fight wars with. If there are no people, there is no hunger.

  • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    Guess what fuckos! We will witness agricultural failure in our lifetimes. So glad we made 200 people insanely rich in the process

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      But what parties they get to have on their super mega yachts while abusing the people that work for them or are abducted by them! /s

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Some sources said 2023 was first to hit +1.5C. Must have been 1.495C. This year is ahead of 2023. CO2 measurements this spring were above the decades 2.5ppm per year, which was the highest decade increase. Temperature increases lag CO2 levels.

    Forest fires and spread are at high activitity at current temperatures. Arctic ice keeps shrinking without record temperatures. Natural methane releases even as human activity methane gets deregulated.

    There is no expectation of seeing a temperature decrease even if 2025 ends up 3rd instead of 2nd. The precision for exact carbon budget may have been overestimated.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      It was never that precise; it was a budget for a 50% chance of keeping a long-term average below a given number