• AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I bought an oled phone for 200€ a few years back. What I’d really want is that every smartphone sold in the EU is open, with open drivers and OS with root access if you want to. And some investments by the EU to support open smartphone OS.

    What a shithole civilization.

  • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    a few things i like:

    • moments is an interesting concept
    • it says you can toggle off gemini ai. this is good
    • display goes from 10-120hz for battery
    • ultrawide selfie camera
    • microsd card slot!
    • power button fingerprint scanner, way better than underscreen
  • Bjarne@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Was really hoping to see a Fairphone 6a. Similar to the Google Pixel Series. Just a cheap version of it. I really don’t need 120Hz, OLED or “No Bezels” all i want is big battery and a headphone jack that is all.

  • carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Compared to the Fairphone 5 it has some improvements but also a few downsides:

    Pro:

    • It’s a bit smaller (~4mm) and lighter (~20g)
    • Slightly better camera (future tests will tell how much better)
    • 120 Hz display
    • More RAM and storage (although I feel that the previous 6GB/128GB option was also sufficient for most users)
    • WiFi 6E Tri-Band (however you will likely never need this speed)
    • Bluetooth 5.4
    • Slightly larger battery

    Con:

    • Backpanel now requires a screwdriver
    • Display has less resolution/PPI
    • Performance of processor will likely be nearly identical to predecessor (however it’s more efficient and modern)
    • Downgrade to USB 2
    • 600€

    My conclusion: Overall the improvements are ok, however just releasing the Fairphone 5 with a newer SoC might have been the better/more cost effective choice. Sacrificing display resolution for 120 Hz feels also quite wrong. 600€ is very pricy for a phone like this. Cutting some premium features away like the 120 Hz display or a bit of RAM and storage (that you can extend anyway with an SD card) might have saved enough to get the launch price down to somewhere near 500€ which would make it accessible for a wider audience.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Worth noting buying a second hand phone is still better in every aspect and sadly 2nd hand Samsung from 3 years ago is still better and cheaper. Though Fairphone is getting closer with each release!

  • Luca@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Fairphone is probably going to be my new phone when I upgrade.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I just want them to make a true flagship phone. I personally wouldn’t mind paying extra for a more ethical phone, if it had all the bells and whistles and wasn’t half obsolete straight out of the box.

  • blinfabian@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    650€ is way too expensive for an unknown phone brand with an unknown OS installed on it smh. i’d love to buy one but considering you can get a samsung for less than 500€

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I would totally buy one of these if they were sold in the US. Sadly, last time I checked the newest phone wasn’t sold here. So I doubt this one will be.